자가조혈모세포이식 시 저용량 디피브로타이드 요법의 간정맥폐쇄증 예방 효과

자가조혈모세포이식 시 저용량 디피브로타이드 요법의 간정맥폐쇄증 예방 효과

VOD prophylaxis of Low dose Defibrotide after high dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation

(구연):
Release Date : 2017. 10. 27(금)
Yun Young Roh1,2, Jung Min Park1,2, Ju Yeon Lim1,2, Lily Myung-Jin Cha1,2, Jun Pyo Hong1,2, Seung Min Hahn 1,2, Chuhl Joo Lyu1,2 , Jung Woo Han1,2
Yonsei Cancer Center Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 1
Yonsei Univeresity College of Medicine Department of Pediatrics2
노윤영1,2, 박정민1,2, 임주연1,2, 차명진1,2, 홍준표1,2, 한승민1,2, 유철주1,2 , 한정우1,2
연세의료원 연세암병원 소아혈액종양과1
연세대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실2

Abstract

Background and Aims: Hepatic veno-occlusive disease(VOD) is the serious complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(HSCT) to cause significant morbidity and mortality. Defibrotide is used for treatment for VOD and the prophylactic role is under investigation now. Due to the cost and worry about the side effects, we investigated low dose defibrotide for prophylaxis Methods: Total 93 patients who received HSCT from March 2013 to July 2017 in Yonsei Cancer Center were reviewed retrospectively. We matched prophylaxis group (N=31) to non-prophylaxis group (N=62) by 1:2. Low dose prophylaxis was composed of half of usual dose and administered from D-3 to D+7. Results : Diagnosis in the cohort was medulloblastoma(29%), neuroblastoma(19%), primitive neuroectodermal tumor (15%), atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor(11%), and others (26%). Median age at diagnosis was 4.0 (3.0 – 6.0) in prophylaxis group and 4.0 (3.0-6.0). Neutrophil engraftment was achieved at median 12.0 (11.0 – 13.0) days in prophylaxis group and 13.0 (12.0 – 14.0) in non-prophylaxis group. Median dose for prophylactic defibrotide was 13.0 (12.3-15.9)(mg/kg/day). In non-prophylaxis group, 9/62 (14.5%) developed VOD, whereas in prophylaxis group, only 1 in 31 (3.2%) developed VOD (p=0.098). In the first HSCT group, there was no VOD (0/14) in prophylaxis group compared with 4/44 (9%) developed VOD in non-prophylaxis group ( P=0.242). In the second HSCT group, 5.9% (1/17) in prophylaxis group developed VOD but 28% (5/18) developed in non prophylaxis group ( P=0.086). In total group, there was 9 transplant related mortality and 2 was related with VOD. VOD related mortality was in non-prophylaxis group. Conclusion: Low dose defibrotide prophylaxis was considered as effective for prevention of VOD related morbidity and mortality for HSCT.

Keywords: Hepatic veno-occlusive disease(VOD), Defibrotide, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation